<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Law Commission - England and Wales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawcommission.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Father Knowledge Center Europe - FKCE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of Child Custody Law (1986) &#8211; Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 by Children Act 1989 – the elimination of shared parenting &#171; Robert Whiston</title>
		<link>http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Children Act 1989 – the elimination of shared parenting &#171; Robert Whiston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] and http://robertwhiston.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/12/ and full text at http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and <a href="http://robertwhiston.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/12/" rel="nofollow">http://robertwhiston.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/12/</a> and full text at <a href="http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/" rel="nofollow">http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of Child Custody Law (1986) &#8211; Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 by 12 &#171; Robert Whiston</title>
		<link>http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>12 &#171; Robert Whiston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] See: Law Commision Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 - Review of Child Custody Law (1986) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See: Law Commision Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 &#8211; Review of Child Custody Law (1986) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of Child Custody Law (1986) &#8211; Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 by 5. Twenty wasted years - Joint custody is not new or untested, two decades ago it was common in England &#171; Robert Whiston</title>
		<link>http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/1986/10/01/00001/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>5. Twenty wasted years - Joint custody is not new or untested, two decades ago it was common in England &#171; Robert Whiston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawcommission.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] “Family Law Review of Child Law: Custody; Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 - Custody Law in Prac...; Law Commission; by J. A. Priest and J. C. Whybrow; London; August [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Family Law Review of Child Law: Custody; Supplement to Working Paper No. 96 &#8211; Custody Law in Prac&#8230;; Law Commission; by J. A. Priest and J. C. Whybrow; London; August [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
